Thanks for the notice. I filled a serious bug against libquartz-java to prevent migration to testing. I also filled a bug against ftp.debian.org to remove the package from unstable.
I'll try to fix my mess this week. Thanks everyone for the quick help. On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Emmanuel Bourg <[email protected]> wrote: > They released a version 2.0 that is binary incompatible and shares the same > package name and the same Maven artifact, that was a very poor decision. > > Building a libquartz2-java package for Debian is probably a sensible choice. > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > Le 16/04/2012 18:35, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit : > >> [CC me please] >> >> Dead Java-gurus, >> >> Could someone please let me know how can I check whether or not a >> java jar is compatible with a past version ? >> >> Apparently libquartz-java 2.x is not compatible with 1.x version. Am >> I reading the following correctly: >> >> http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.quartz-scheduler/quartz >> >> Shouldn't all version ve compatible ? >> >> Thanks ! >> >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:23 PM, [email protected] >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi Mathieu, >>> I am forwarding this email to you directly as you are the one who >>> uploaded latest release of libquarzt-java. >>> I sent the mail first to pkg-java-maintainers mailing. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Olivier >>> >>> -------- Message original -------- >>> Sujet: libquartz-java v2 has incomptabilities with previous version >>> Date : Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:13:52 +0200 >>> De : Olivier Sallou<[email protected]> >>> Répondre à : [email protected] >>> Pour : [email protected] >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> recent upload of quartz v2.1.4 in sid created some issue in one of my >>> package and will certainly impact many other packages. >>> The change from v1.x to 2.x introduced some incompatibilities in APIs. >>> There is a backward compatibility jar but it does not solve all problems. >>> >>> This result in failure even in "common" usages. >>> >>> Shouldn't package be named libquartz2-java to keep compatibility with >>> packages depending on previous version ? and as such supporting dual >>> versions ? >>> >>> >>> Olivier >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) >>> Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438 >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Mathieu >> >> > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [email protected] > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected] > -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ca+7wusyrp41eiarrs1wgfqpqqex754dd_j_gdfxhq+f-smj...@mail.gmail.com
