Sorry for this late reply. On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 10:43:51AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi, > > A couple of lintian warnings worth considering to fix: > > N: Processing binary package slashtime (version 0.5.13-1, arch all) ... > [...] > W: slashtime: old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file > E: slashtime: description-starts-with-package-name > I: slashtime: description-synopsis-might-not-be-phrased-properly > W: slashtime: missing-classpath libjava-gnome-java > W: slashtime: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/slashtime I hope I have fixed some warnings, errors etc... My lintian did not output all these lines + debexpo tells me that my package is lintian clean. > The run script (usr/bin/slashtime) is broken - I don't get the "cd /usr" It is used so the application can locate icons. Upstream contains a 'share/pixmaps' directory so the 'cd /usr' is used so the application can locate icons in '/usr/share/pixmaps'.
> part and "exec /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/java" will > definitely not work for an arch:all package. Furthermore I believe "$@" > is better than $* when it comes to arguments with spaces and such (note > the quotes on the first). I have made a patch for that and tell the upstream author that he should fix that upstream :) > You may or may not be missing a short-name for the first "files" > paragraph in d/copyright. I don't remember my DEP-5 here, but you have > one for the second paragraph, so I assumed you forgot it for the first one. As far as I know the copyright file is ok and this syntax is correct according to http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5 I've re-uploaded the package on debexpo and also commited the new revision of the file in the pkg-java team SVN. Thank you for reviewing my package. -- Guillaueme Mazoyer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
