On 2011-11-15 18:25, James Page wrote: > On 14/11/11 18:46, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: >> Hi James, > > [...] >
Hi, >> Have you noticed a common FTBFS pattern for all this packages ? Or >> all failure seems differents ? > > There are some common trends - for example I have seen the following > issues: > > 1) Failures due to source file encoding and default behaviour with javac > 2) Packaging issues where the package depends on default-jdk but > JAVA_HOME is set to point at /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk > 3) Changes to the JDBC API's causing source incompatibility > 4) Removal of internal API's causing issues for packages which use them > > Cheers > > James > 2) is a FTBFS in Debian (or it should be already), because java-6-openjdk does not exist anymore (it is java-6-openjdk-$arch). Feel free to file (serious) bugs for that in Debian. I think Ubuntu may have "lowered" requirements here but I am not 100% sure[1]. At least it could be the reason why you do not see the FTBFS with the normal openjdk-6 in Ubuntu. ~Niels [1] """ java-common (0.43ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low * Keep old jvm symlinks in the openjdk-6-jre-headless package. java-common (0.43) unstable; urgency=low * Depend on the multiarch aware openjdk-6-jre-headless. * Default to openjdk-6 on ppc64. * update-java-alternatives: Substitute <jname> with <jname>-<arch>. -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Thu, 20 Oct 2011 [...] """ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ecb4a80.9080...@thykier.net
