Hey, I got an email from Launchpad about the colorpicker project, which is currently "maintained" by the pkg-java team in Launchpad. Long story short, this is not acceptable because the pkg-java team is under an open-subscription policy[1]. For now I have given the maintainership of colorpick back to Andrew Ross, which should solve the immediate issue.
But it does raise the question of how to handle this in general. We already have two teams on Launchpad (pkg-java and debian-java, both open), so we could close one of them to maintain these projects and leave the other one open. But this implies that the administrators of the closed team[2] are stricter in our acceptance (plus we would have to double check existing members). For reference, the "project pages" in question are launchpad's "upstream projects", so I am not even 100% sure it makes sense for the Java Team to control these. So, should we keep both teams open (and not accept maintainership of any "projects") or close one of them for this purpose? ~Niels [1] I am not certain the rationale is public at the moment, so I will not disclose it now. [2] Currently they are both administrated by Torsen Werner, Damien Raude-Morvan and myself. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ea6fbea.6020...@thykier.net
