> However, I don't see this change going in Squeeze. If you are OK, I will > upload your modification as soon as Squeeze is out (and also in Ubuntu). > This will allow us some deeper testing and potential side effects. > > How does it sound ? > Sylvestre
Sounds great - I didn't expect it to get into squeeze/ubuntu and think it needs testing before making into a stable release. I don't know if you saw this: On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Matthias Klose <matthias.kl...@canonical.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Scott Howard<showard...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I also don't >>> know if a user setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH on their own overwrites our >>> java.library.path > > this is incomplete; only works if the jvm is called by the java binary. > I'm seeking some more help from java people at sun one last time before we might have to just say that an incomplete solution might be the only policy-compliant [1] solution for a non-free package. Please, if anyone knows of a better way let us know (the joys of non-free packages: features can be undocumented and a mystery!). The best fix is to use open-jdk, which I've been suggesting to users. [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.9 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinjdm36gofed=dc-a4bo0r931n5ubsj1rmu7...@mail.gmail.com
