Le mardi 23 mars 2010 à 11:54 +0100, Niels Thykier a écrit : > Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > Le mardi 23 mars 2010 à 10:26 +0100, Niels Thykier a écrit : > >> Hi > >> > >> I have compiled two patches against the current policy that I intend to > >> apply Friday assuming there are no objections. > > Nice work. Glad to see that finally evolving. > > > Sure, what do you think of this: > > In the past gcj packages were added in order to improve > performance of Java libraries and programs. However, this > performance comes at the cost of size, extra compilation > time and creates architecture dependent packages. > > A request for permission to add gcj should packages should > convince the Java Team that the performance boost of adding > the gcj package or packages out-weights the disadvantages. > > The request and the permission may be limited to certain > architectures. It is perfect and it also explains why we used gcj in the past.
Thanks Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
