-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ludovic Claude wrote: > A little note about the license for the debian/* files: you set the > license to GPL-3 (actually, mh_make did that for you). It's considered > maybe best practice to use the same license for the Debian packaging as > for the main package, so here Apache 2 may have been a better choice. > But of course, you are the packager, so the choice is yours. Correct me if I'm wrong, debian/ under upstream license could be good when forwarding patches to upstream to keep the same license. Changed debian/ to ASL 2.0 even because it's a "public package" and there may be different points of view.
> I will update mh_make to work more like this when it can find the > license in the upstream project. > > I'm not a DD, so you still need a sponsor! Thanks for your review. Cheers, Gabriele http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/enforcer/enforcer_1.0~beta2-1.dsc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuAXSYACgkQp3cdCbVcnCtKXgCeJPXNHNxUqDp86r3D5QuFozlb QY4An2cyRc4OK4nH4vklmqFqDB8dnUPU =RRjM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b805d26.9020...@gmail.com
