On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 03:53:43PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Michael Koch <konque...@gmx.de> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 02:50:23PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I am looking for sponsorship for java-gnome 4.0.13-3. This revision > >> should fix FTBFS on Debian buildd. > >> > >> The latest changelog entry for reference. > >> java-gnome (4.0.13-3) unstable; urgency=low > >> > >> * debian/rules > >> - Do not build docs on anything other than i386, amd64, powerpc. > >> Fixes FTBFS on Debian as well as Ubuntu buildd. > > > > I have a bit of headache with this change. Cant you just disable the doc > > build? > > buildd normally only call binary-arch target, not binary-indep target of > > debian/rules. You can test this on your local machine > > debuild/dpkg-buildpackge -B > > when building. I know that in Ubuntu one buildd does all the arch-indep > > builds. > > I think it was i386 or amd64. So this should work. An it saves some > > resources > > on the buildds. Your solution is more a mess then a solution to me. > > I discussed this in the Ubuntu MOTU IRC channel (assuming there are > some people who know about both Debian and Ubuntu buildd).[1] I was > told that > ideally I should have 'make doc' target called from build-indep, but > this doesn't work in practice as dpkg-buildpackage always calls both > build-arch and build-indep targets. > So I tried following Steve Langasek's suggestion of adding 'make doc' > in binary-indep. But then the screenshots generated are somehow ugly > for reason that I don't know.[2] > > I agree that this is more of a hack than a solution. But this is the > best I have got considering that I have to find a common solution > which will work on both Debian as well as Ubuntu buildd. > Meanwhile I will work with upstream to get this working without any > hacks, once I sync up upstream code and start looking into it. > > [1]http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/09/10/%23ubuntu-motu.txt > [2]http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/2536/aboutdialog.png
I thought about something like the attached. I dont know why the weird setting to DISPLAY is needed at all. Can you please provide in image which provides screenshots side-by-side to make the problem more clear to? You image above looks normal to me. Cheers, Michael
Index: rules =================================================================== --- rules (Revision 10736) +++ rules (Arbeitskopie) @@ -4,12 +4,11 @@ include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools.mk include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk +export DISPLAY=":99" DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS += --libdir=/usr/lib/jni jdk=/usr/lib/jvm/default-java -ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH), i386 amd64 powerpc)) -DEB_MAKE_ENVVARS += DISPLAY=":99" -DEB_MAKE_BUILD_TARGET += doc -endif +build/libjava-gnome-java-doc:: + $(MAKE) doc get-orig-source: uscan --force-download --rename
