Harald Krammer schrieb: > Hello Pantelis, > > Pantelis Koukousoulas schrieb: >> On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Harald Krammer <harald.kram...@hkr.at> >> wrote: > [..] >>> Hello, >>> I would like to deploy a customized Eclipse development environment on >>> Debian Etch/Lenny. >> Excellent! >> We have already started an effort to get eclipse into shape for debian >> and there is >> a preliminary "monolithic" package. See: > >> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-java-maintainers/2008-December/018863.html >> for the details.
how does this compare to the packages started by Michael? See http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2008/06/msg00036.html >> Nathan summers (aka Rockwalrus) seems to also be reviving his efforts >> so you can see >> the ubuntu eclipse-team stuff and > >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/eclipse-ubuntu > * I have dropped ALL not-absolutely-essential features in favor > of having things work from the POV of the user so it is almost > possible to > understand how the packaging works :-) (hint: focus on the > pretty big/hairy scripts under debian/scripts) It may be better to build on top on the existing packaging. It's there for a reason. I think your approach makes it difficult to update the package in the distribution. Please make sure that your package does build on platforms like mips, powerpc and sparc as well. > * GCJ dropped, builds/uses openjdk-6 now which means no bizarre > random segfaults all over the place, undoubtedly a good thing :-) No, it's bad for all those platforms which don't have a JIT. It's a different (good) thing to build with OpenJDK, but don't drop the -gcj packages. > * The SWT .so files are built from source. The .so files that > come with the source zip are explicitly deleted before the build these have to be removed from the source, not deleted at build time. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
