Hi all, sat4j finally found its way into unstable, so you might want to start testing it for your eclipse packaging effort.
I had still used sun-java6-jdk for building it, thus it currently resides in contrib. I'll switch over to openjdk-6-jdk with the next upload (build already tested, works fine), but for testing your eclipse builds that should not matter terribly much. [...] @Andrew: > > > Further, I removed all the tests (for now), because most of them lack proper > > license info. I'll talk to Daniel about this. > > Cool, please keep me posted on this. > > > Otherwise, no patching was necessary when using the 2_0_1 tag in > > upstream SVN. > > That's great. I am still on 2.0.0 so that I get the same as what Orbit > has and was going to wait until 2.0.2 to upgrade. > 2.0.2 is out (2008-08-06), but tests still lack proper license information. The new version has been reported as #493917 in the Debian BTS, and I'll probably clone this bug to track the license issue. Daniel is tracking this as http://forge.objectweb.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=310644&group_id=228&atid=350289 One thing I'm still not too sure about is the versioning. Daniel uses 2.0.X in the SVN repository, but releases using, e.g., 20080806. Best, Michael
pgpZIPEJvFI1V.pgp
Description: PGP signature
