Hi all, For some time I have been trying to package batik 1.7 for Ubuntu Intrepid.[1] In the process I have packaged it's dependency xml-commons-external.[2]
I have done repackaging of upstream source in similar manner to how it was done for 1.6, with svn export from fop. But some doubts were discussed in #ubuntu-motu on which we would like to have your inputs. 1. Should the code downloaded by svn export go as patch instead of inside repackaged source? 2. If the answer to above is 'it should go in repackaged source', then what should be the version? Should it contain .dfsg or +svn? [1] - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/batik/+bug/150484 [2] - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid/+source/xml-commons-external Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
