On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 07:04:00PM +0200, RalfGesellensetter wrote: > Am Montag 30 Juni 2008 schrieb Florian Grandel: > > Thank you very much for your opinion. That's what I was thinking as > > well and how I started doing it now. > > Hi Florian, hi Michael, > > sounds sound to me - but: > Intersection also implies waste of space. In cases where the overlapping > base classes extend 1 MB (after installation) and take more than the > half of all, it might be better to create a base-package and state > dependencies of server and client packages against this base package. > > In some cases, the overhead of the client package is that low, that you > could make the server package (w/o base classes) dependent on the > client package (incl. base classes). > > What do you think?
Creating different JAR contents than upstream only leads to user irritation. Disk space is relativly cheap today so that should not be an issue. Cheers, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
