Am Dienstag, den 09.10.2007, 06:35 +0200 schrieb Michael Koch: > Hello Daniel, > > > On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 02:47:22AM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: > > Thanks for your explanations. The package is now waiting to be uploaded > > by my sponsor. I hope, it will hit Debian soon. The test-case is > > properly processed, so the package seems to work properly. > > If you want I can take a look at the package too.
The ready-to-use package is at http://debian.wgdd.de/debian/incoming/packages/docbook-xsl-saxon_1.00.dfsg.1-1.dsc. The debian packaging files are at http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-xml-sgml/packages/docbook-xsl-saxon/trunk/debian/?rev=0&sc=0 (you can use svn-buildpackage to build the package yourself - note, that debian/rules contains the get-orig-source target to create the orig tarball). > Let me know if you need another sponsor or want an opinion from another DD. Thanks for the offer. But my sponsor (Michael Banck) is doing a very good job, so I don't think, I need another one :) Of course I appreciate feedback about the packaging files and the package. > > > I hope my answers help a bit. > > > > Yes, thanks. So I can begin packaging the extensions for Xalan too. > > As this stuff is for Java stuff, would it make sense to maintain it in > pkg-java SVN with Debian Java Maintainers as maintainer? I also thought about this. ATM I maintain this from within the Debian XML/SGML group and infrastructure, because it's related to docbook-xsl, one of my other packages. But I'm subscribed to the Debian Java (packaging) mailing lists. Let's see, what the future brings and if I should change this. Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
