Michael Koch wrote: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> * ["JVM"], ["JRE"] and ["SDK"] (TODO: these might all be removed, or >> redirected to this page here?!) >> >> == Java from Sun == >> + * ["Java/Sun"] - some info about the openjdk in debian >> - * ["Java/Sun"] - Sun's Implementation is available in Debian >> + * SunJava - Sun's Implementation is available in Debian non-free >> - * SunJava > > I think this one of the most misleading parts in our wiki. >
If you want to settle on exactly one of the misleading/inconsistent/redundant parts, maybe :) (I'm trying to invest some time everytime I have some left to get that cleaned up) > I dont know if that is possible but Java/SUN should be renamed to > Java/OpenJDK Yes it should, I'll check if it's possible. > and SunJava should be renamed to Java/SUN. Yes, to have it in the Java hierarchy of the wiki. There are more pages linked from tha main Java page which fall into this category. > And Iwould not > keep OpenJDK under "Java from SUN". > OpenJDK is/will be a community project with SUN as its most prominent > member. That doesnt mean its SUN only anymore. Yes, OpenJDK is community, adn this is what is targetted to package for main. But there will probably( I rather ask but state this here) always be some binary jdk/jre distribution from sun (which will ever be in non-free, as an updated version to what they have now in version 5 and 6. Henning -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
