Riku Voipio writes: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:03:22PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:53:19PM +0100, Wookey wrote: > > > I can work around some of the failures, but I can't really be > > > bothered: the real fix for this is EABI. > > > Unfortunately, the EABI won't fix this either. In its native form it > > supported neither forced unwinding nor _Unwind_Backtrace; we added > > forced unwinding for the benefit of NPTL (though we're still talking > > to ARM intermittently about its semantics). But no one's tried to > > make _Unwind_Backtrace work yet, and it's not clear how to. To me > > anyway. I've thought about recognizing the standard and/or GNU > > personality routines in libgcc... > > Due to the amount of core libraries and tools building java bindings, > this is pretty much the top technical roadblock[1] on current debian > arm eabi port.
Interesting. My usual reponse to this is "get me hardware running the OS and I'l have a look." Andrew. -- Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
