On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 02:55:28PM +0100, Paul Cager wrote: > I am preparing a new upload of JTA to fix some bugs. > > The source package is "jta" and the binary package is "jta". Should I > change the binary package to be "libjta-java", or leave it alone? > > * Jta has no reverse dependencies. > * I'll be adding a "-doc" binary package, so it will end up in the > new queue anyway.
Is jta only a library package or does it include a standalone tool? In the first case you should rename it. In the later case I would prefer to keep the name. This would be the same situation as for ant or checkstyle. Cheers, Michael -- .''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org> `. `' | `- | 1024D/BAC5 4B28 D436 95E6 F2E0 BD11 5923 A008 2763 483B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
