On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 01:14:56PM +0200, Robert Schuster wrote: > Hi, > > Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > > [I replyed from pkg-java-maintainers to debian-java because I prefer > > pkg-java-maintainers's list to be only for bug reports] > > I will use debian-java for packaging diffs from now on. :) > > >>>The escher source archive (0.2.3) is a bit odd. It contains no separate > >>>source > >>>and has all the class files in it. I tried to fix that in the clean rule. > >>>Hope > >>>that makes sense. > > That's the way to go. > > Another problem is that the root for the source files is the archive's root > itself. In other words: It has no separate source folder. Out of knowledge I > fixed that in the clean rule, too. However that makes the diff pretty big and > it > may be more useful to fix that problem in some kind of compilation-preparation > step (It is just mkdir src; mv gnu src;) > > >>>+Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (>= 4.1.0), java-gcj-compat-dev, ant > >>>+Standards-Version: 3.6.2 > > > > > > Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (>= 4.1.0) > > Build-Depends-Indep: java-gcj-compat-dev, ant > > Standards-Version: 3.7.2 > > > > [...] > Fixed! > > >>>+DEB_JARS := \ > >>>+ ant-launcher > > > > > > I don't think it's needed anymore. > I am afraid I get NoClassDefFoundErrors without that. However I am building > the > package on an Ubuntu system. Hope that isnt to much of a problem...?
That's an Ubuntu problem for not merging our patches to CDBS. In Debian its not needed and it should not be in the debian/rules file. Ubuntu should be fixed instead. Cheers, Michael -- http://www.worldforge.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
