Matthias Klose <doko <at> cs.tu-berlin.de> writes: > > now that non-free java jre's and jdk's are available in non-free, we > should get some agreement about the priorities for the different tools > and environments. some proposals: > > - things in main have higher priorities than things in contrib > and non-free.
Sounds fine to me. > > - an alternative installed as a "set" of alternatives has higher > priority than a single tool. Do you have an example in mind where that would be useful? > - tools conforming to a higher "java version" have a higher priority > (unsure if that is necessary). We have no way to figure out which java version tools conform to, so I don't think that is possible. > - ordering of the free runtimes. can we agree on some kind of order? I'd suggest a popcon based ordering. Reevaluate for every release / 6 months, etc. which should let us shuffle things around as necessary. cheers, dalibor topic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
