On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 03:08:35PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote: > On 2/4/06, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 12:36:55PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote: > > > Now that gij 4.1 can run many java2 mainstream applications, such as > > > Azureus, is debian-java ready to provide a package in main that > > > provides java2-runtime? > > > > We should get rid of this numbered javaX-runtime. This doesnt really > > help these days anyway. > > Should applications simply depend on java-runtime then, instead of > java2-runtime?
That is not decided yet. We started to discuss this at last DevJam meeting. I hope can discuss this more at FOSDEM and come to conclusion we can put into our policy. The main idea was to provide java-runtime for proprietary runtimes and classpath-runtime for free runtimes. This has to be thought out more before we change the policy and any exisitng package. Cheers Michael -- Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
