Maybe we can also split the page and put the "working packages" (not yet in main) on a second page.
-- Arnaud Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:13:59 +0800, Alan Tam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2005-03-22 18:16, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > >>I've updated http://java.debian.net/index.php/MovingJavaToMain to >>[...] >> >> > I still find it difficult to comprehend. > > Note the strucutre: > * Introduction > * Who is working on which package ATM to move it to main ? > * Removing libant1.5-java dependency from packages ! > * Removing libservlet2.2-java dependency from packages ! > * Packages currently in NEW queue > * Already to main! > * Should go to main! > * Jakarta > * Unknown > * Swing problem > * JDBC > * More comments > > It sounds interesting in that Jakarta and JDBC are not under "Should go > to main!", so they should /not/ go to main? > > Shall we make it a 2-level structure, like this? > * Introduction > * Current Work > ** Who is working on which package ATM to move it to main ? > ** Removing libant1.5-java dependency from packages ! > ** Removing libservlet2.2-java dependency from packages ! > * Already to main! > * Packages currently in NEW queue > * Should go to main! > ** Jakarta > ** Swing problem > ** JDBC > ** Others > * Unknown reasons for not in main > * More comments > > -- > Regards, > Alan > > Answer: Because we read from top to bottom, from left to right. > Question: Why should we put replies after the original text? > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
