28 Apr 2005 10:33:49 -0600, Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> "Arnaud" == Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Arnaud> About the gcj ABI, it'd be cool to know the plans of the gcj > Arnaud> devs before putting efforts in packaging java to native ;-) > > GCC 4.0 includes the first working version of the BC ABI. However, we > don't yet promise actual binary compatibility -- we've kept open the > possibility that we made some error and that code compiled BC with 4.0 > will have to be recompiled to work with the library shipped with 4.1. > > We already know we'll have to change the code we're generating; i.e., > we've found a couple of bugs. However, at the moment it looks like we > can remain backward compatible.
Many thanks for all your fair informations. > Here's a page explaining the basics of how we're building > applications using BC for FC: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/How%20to%20BC%20compile%20with%20GCJ Net! Many thanks, -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]