28 Apr 2005 10:33:49 -0600, 
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

>>>>>> "Arnaud" == Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Arnaud> About the gcj ABI, it'd be cool to know the plans of the gcj
> Arnaud> devs before putting efforts in packaging java to native ;-)
>
> GCC 4.0 includes the first working version of the BC ABI.  However, we
> don't yet promise actual binary compatibility -- we've kept open the
> possibility that we made some error and that code compiled BC with 4.0
> will have to be recompiled to work with the library shipped with 4.1.
>
> We already know we'll have to change the code we're generating; i.e.,
> we've found a couple of bugs.  However, at the moment it looks like we
> can remain backward compatible.

Many thanks for all your fair informations.

> Here's a page explaining the basics of how we're building
> applications using BC for FC:
>
>     http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/How%20to%20BC%20compile%20with%20GCJ

Net! Many thanks,

-- 
  .''`. 
 : :' :rnaud
 `. `'  
   `-    
Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to