Barry, thanks for your answer. I thought the policy was more dated, since last time I checked had many disagreements with other sources.
Two more: the wiki at java.debian.net is reliable for the details not covered in the policy? java-package is the prefered way of getting a non-free jdk? > -----Original Message----- > From: Barry Hawkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Lunes, 25 de Abril de 2005 12:57 p.m. > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: debian-java@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: java policy > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Martin Ferrari - DECIDIR Argentina wrote: > > I would want to know if > > http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/ is still > > authoritative and if there is some repository of documentation for > > debian-java. I'm still confused about what is current. > Martin, > Hi. That appears to match what we currently have in the > java-common > package, so as far as what's currently "official", that would > be it. As > you can see from viewing our archives over most of 2005, there are a > number of things we have been discussing that will probably > be reflected > in an update to java policy once we reach concensus and implement the > decision(s). Some of the issues are quite complex, and we have been > discussing the need for a face-to-face meeting of the Debian Java team > to get some of these issues under discussion worked out. > The rest of the gang can chime in, but I wanted to at > least provide > you with a quick answer. > > Regards, > - -- > Barry Hawkins > All Things Computed > site: www.alltc.com > weblog: www.yepthatsme.com > > Registered Linux User #368650 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFCbRLCHuKcDICy0QoRAo+zAJ94YAOuVGlzIZRzs2W//cW9E39QKwCgroaJ > aik0RopwGhRISZqJokmJRB4= > =EIo9 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
