-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sun, 24 Apr 2005 16:11:22 -0400, Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote: >> Sat, 23 Apr 2005 18:34:23 -0400, >> Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] >>>The Commons Collections package is one that is currently inconsistent, >>>and some others are similar, so I'd like to sort that out that then >>>roll forward and get things all squared away. With the exception of >>>dropping "lib" from the source package, does the reorganization of the >>>Commons Collections packaging as outlined in the original post suit >>>you? >> >> Except the lib prefix, what reorganisation do you plan? Moving >> everything to cdbs? YES! Add a debian/watch file? YES! Change the >> Maintainer to pkg-java-maintainers? YES! > [...] > libcommons-collections-java binary package becomes: > libcommons-collections2-java > libcommons-collections2-java-doc ok, that's bad :-p > libcommons-collections3-java binary package becomes: > libcommons-collections3-java > libcommons-collections3-java-doc > > Both 2 and 3 currently use CDBS, and 2 has Debian Java Maintainers as > the maintainer. I think Takashi will agree moving c-coll3 to pkg-java-maintainers. > [...] >> About the lib prefix, I think we need a deeper investigation because >> it's not needed to remove the lib prefix and then add it back! ;-) > [...] > Absolutely. As I mentioned, I am not strongly committed to the idea of > removing that prefix from the source packages, so the feedback I am > getting from you guys really helps to flesh that out. If most of us > find the lib prefix for source and binary packages of Java libraries > most intuitive, that's OK with me. I think we should re-discuss that maybe. Cheers, - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCbARI4vzFZu62tMIRArwmAKCOnNXRD/Crad5L8K/1va0iI00xKACgpeoa KPXuSgl0whZcufpTVAX3dfs= =fYQK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
