On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 06:26:55PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > Sat, 12 Mar 2005 23:43:55 -0600, > Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 00:28 -0500, Barry Hawkins wrote: > >> Jerry Haltom wrote: > >> | I had a bright idea for our Java policy which I want to discuss: > >> | installing all javadoc in a centralized location and linking it > >> | together. > >> [...] > > Idea is super bright, I had the same one last week :-D I already > discussed with Julian Scheid for some hints because I was dreaming of a > overview page with all the packages, but I don't think it's a very good > idea at the moment! ;-) So Julian pointed me to -link and -linkoffline > too (I already used these arguments for projects at work) > > >> Jerry, > >> ~ I believe we can link to dependent APIs without using a centralized > >> location as long as we appropriately code the -link and -linkoffline > >> directives in our javadoc commands. Here are a few entries from the > >> Javadoc FAQ[0] that may prove helpful for the discussion: > > I prefer this one. > > > Yes definitely. However, using /usr/share/javadoc would put us in line > > with JPackage. And I think it's a good idea too. Even if we link > > from /usr/share/javadoc to /usr/share/doc/package/api. > > I'm not sure we can create /usr/share/javadoc without discussing it on > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And probably LSB/FHSSTD too. Michael -- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
