Stefan Gybas wrote:
Sure, but since neither classpath nor libgcj* provide the virtual runtime package
Why doesn't libgcj provide the virtual runtime package? It seems like it should. -- --Per Bothner [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bothner.com/per/
Stefan Gybas wrote:
Sure, but since neither classpath nor libgcj* provide the virtual runtime package
Why doesn't libgcj provide the virtual runtime package? It seems like it should. -- --Per Bothner [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bothner.com/per/