-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
> Well. It is mostly because to help the build daemons. Many java packages > (especially in the contrib section) depend on non-packaged stuff to build > the package. So arch independent -java packages are really nice. I'm not sure I see how this helps the build daemons. If something depends on non-packaged stuff at build time, the build daemons can't build it anyway since they won't have the build dependencies available to them. If something doesn't depend on non-packaged stuff at build time then the build daemons should be fine regardless of architecture. > I have now taken a _quick_ look at it. Would it be possible to use the > .c stuff (arch dependent) stuff outside of java? Not really. The C library contains java-specific wrappers. In fact, all that's really in the libreadline-java C library is java-specific wrappers to the usual libedit routines. > Can the java classes be used without the .c (arch dependent) stuff? No. They will not function without the C library (the JVM will throw an exception if the C library is not available). > I know I'm in favour of splitting things but I also know that all people > are not. :) I do believe in this instance that neither the java classes nor the C library make sense without the other. Ben. :) - -- Ben Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To love oneself is the beginning of a lifelong romance. - Oscar Wilde -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9gJKjMQNuxza4YcERAoq5AJ9pV9P8GLKNQx4iChrj4cC2XcQ9aQCgmpFe p6haJIjTU/7MV1CyK0vcgcY= =gCmJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----