Hello! > From: Andrew Pimlott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 11:10 PM
> > Non java > > components should be extracted to a separate package IMHO. > Ok, but I think you should make that explicit in the policy. > Something like, > > If the Java code depends on code written in a "native" language > (eg, via JNI), the compiled .class files should be delivered in > an "Architecture: all" package that depends on an > architecture-specific package containing the compiled native > code. Looks like that .class files should depend on a virtual package provided by an architecture-specific one instead of depending on that arch-dependent package directly, otherwise you will have to have different packages feauturing the same .class files. Yours Sincerely, Lev B. Olkhovich -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
