At Tue, 25 Sep 2001 21:45:03 +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote: > I don't care much if the package is named libjunit-java or junit, but > I prefer to name application packages (binaries are applications) like > the application itself. It's just important that there's only one package > containing both the script and the jar.
I agree you, Stefan. I'll devide junit into junit and junit-doc (indeed document is too big). It seems better for me. ---- Takashi Okamoto
