On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 12:32:51AM -0500, Ben Burton wrote: > > > Well we have both ways in debian now. Should we allow both but prefer > > one? > > Seeing as we're moving to enforce a single consistent standard, I'm > personally happier if we only allow one.
Consistency is good. :) > Looking through what the approximate list of all available java packages > (see first post to this thread) I find: > > libservlet2.2-java > libxalan2-java > > but nothing of the form libname-version-java or lib-name-version-java. > > In what sense do you mean we have both ways in debian now? I supsect I'm > not looking in the right places here. Kernels was on my mind, but they are not libraries. :) > Ben. Ok. Lets standardize on the libfoo[version]-java names. Regards, // Ola -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 584 36 LINKÖPING | | +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / ---------------------------------------------------------------
