On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Hugues Marilleau wrote:
> You should look in /var/log/jserv.log, the error messages are generally
> more explicit than in /var/log/apache/error.log for the Jserv stuff.
[29/08/2000 11:43:43:737 CEST] java.lang.NullPointerException:
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.testConditional(HttpServlet.java:334)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:270)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:311)
at
org.apache.jserv.JServConnection.processRequest(JServConnection.java:314)
at org.apache.jserv.JServConnection.run(JServConnection.java:188)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java)
> And look at http://localhost/status/jserv/, you should see a lot of
> infos about Jserv.
Configured hosts Mapped servlet engines
wr-linux02.rki.de (current) ajpv12://localhost:8007
Parameter Value
Server Name wr-linux02.rki.de
ApJServManual FALSE (AUTOMATIC OPERATION)
ApJServProperties /etc/jserv/jserv.properties
ApJServDefaultProtocol ajpv12 (PORT 8007)
ApJServDefaultHost localhost (ADDR 127.0.0.1)
ApJServDefaultPort 8007
ApJServLogFile DISABLED (DESCRIPTOR -3)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
(I remember my fight to get ServletOutput get logged into the jserv.log
file. May be it will start again now, because I had to wipe out my
working JServ configuration because it didn't worked with the final
potato package. May be someone can tell me how to enable that *any*
information is logged)
ApJServMountCopy TRUE
ApJServShmFile undefined
MountPoint Server Protocol Host Port Zone Status
/servlets/ wr-linux02.rki.de ajpv12 localhost (ADDR 127.0.0.1) 8007 root
/servlet/ wr-linux02.rki.de ajpv12 localhost (ADDR 127.0.0.1) 8007 root
By the way: Does somebody know, why lynx doesn't show the information of
localhost in favour of the host I have configured as squid proxy cache???
It's strange: Netscape shows the information above, but lynx shows the
information from host wr-linux01 which has also a running JServ etc.
> And I don't know that libpgjava was here, I compiled the JDBC PG driver
> from the pg source. It worked perfectly, but it is duplication of
> efforts :/
For sure it is. But it may be worth a try if I would install your deb.
Could you foreward it to me in any way (120kB doesn't seem to much for
my mailbox but I could obtain it anywhere via ftp/http).
May be I could find some differences?
Kind regards
Andreas.
