Hallo Arnaud, * Arnaud Vandyck wrote: >Done. But Jan, before asking for a sponsor, please, take the advises >more seriously! I told you about the two or three problems I got >building eclipse on powerpc (FTBFS). And when I did download eclipse, it >did exactly the same thing! You did not change anything from my >recommendations. I've been obliged to download eclipse on a x86, >building it and then re-download the result to sign it and upload it!
Sorry that this went so bad. For the problem with the SAXException I can do a workaround, but the real fix must come in the ant package. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=240245 For the other bugs you reported (s/i386/powerpc/): I can't see that being a problem. It sould not be the source of any build problem. Changing it without changing it on other places (including java source code) will break eclipse and the easier solution is simple keeping 'i386' on all linux platforms. AFAIR I sent a mail to you to add '-v' to the ant calls to get more verbose output to see the real problem. I'm preparing a new eclipse version, which supports setting a debug flag, so that ant produces verbose output. This version will also have the workaround for the ant problem. I will drop you mail and I hope you are still willing to do some testing then. The upload will be done until tomorrow morning. >By the way, Eclipse MUST be available on powerpc and ATM, it's not in >Debian! I feel the same, but unfortunatelly I don't have a powerpc arround to test the build. I don't even have a 1.3 JDK anymore, as the sun one doesn't work here anymore :( Sorry again for the bad communications and my neglection to fix this bugs. Jan -- Jan Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Wer nicht fragt, bleibt dumm." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
