Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Curiously, > > Can building these .class files built with Kaffee prevent their usage > with a non-free alternative JVM? If Kaffe is totally Java standards > compliant, then that's cool... is that the case? Will there be ANY > deficiencies in these classes by building them with Kaffee?
It should be the case! If not, you have to file a bug and then we'll rebuild the package with non-free JDK and report the problem upstream (I already did with some strange problem when building libsaxon-java but I should detected it because some .class files were missing!). In most cases (not to say all), if it build with free compiler, it runs with free JVM. GNU/Classpath try to avoid 'dumb' classes and I think Kaffe did never do that. > If so, then I can see this causing problems when a user wants to run an > alternative JVM (Because kaffee is missing certain functionality, etc). You're totally right, it's a bug and please let us know! -- Arnaud -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
