Salut Daniel, --- Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isn't it fine if another person testifies that the package works with > this-or-that JVM? I suppose this already happens with specific > architectures or hardware. > So if a package works with a JVM not in its depends, one can file a > (wishlist?) bug againt it. > > Maybe the policy could say "A package must (should?) depend on the > disjunction of all JVMs with which it has been tested succesfully". That > does not force the packager to use any non-free program, but gives > strength to bug reports to include another VM. I think that's a good compromise. I'd make it a 'must', though, for quality assurance reasons. cheers, dalibor topic __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
