On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:00:03AM -0400, Joe Phillips wrote: > I'm in favor of using the -java for JNI + supporting java classes. > After all, it's still a Java library - it's just architecture > dependant. Instead of using -jni, I vote the package be built > architecture dependant. eg. as opposed to _all.deb it's a _i386.deb.
I second this. It should be put in the Java policy this way. There has been a discussion about native-compiled Java code using gcj on this list some month ago but no consensus was reached. Maybe this could be resolved together with the JNI matter now? Greetings, Stefan Gybas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
