Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't care much if the package is named libjunit-java or junit, but > I prefer to name application packages (binaries are applications) like > the application itself.
Me too, so I guess the question changes into whether junit is an application or a library. > No, but libc6 contains also some binaries Sure enough. Got me there. That would indicate that we put everything in libjunit-java. But... > Why can't you include junit.jar in your classpath if the package is > called "junit"? You can, of course. The question is whether the application should include a library. Is there precedent? I hope so since I agree that "tomcat" is the appropriate name for your package. -- Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and mh-e. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
