On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 04:23:47PM -0500, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> Seeing as java policy is getting a work through right now, I personally
> have no problems with removing /usr/share/java/repository in favour of
> versioned jars.
>
> Does anyone have reasons why /usr/share/java/repository should remain?
No do do not like that repository. Can we have some consensus about this?
Should I remove it from the policy?
> Currently the java libraries I package are in the form of:
>
> /usr/share/java/foo-version.jar
> /usr/share/java/foo.jar -> foo-version.jar
This is probably the best one. Should I add that to the repository?
Just one though. The symlink. Should that be automaticly generated
by a tool that are runned from the postinst script or should it
be provided by the (latest, or most compatible) version of the package?
Regards,
// Ola
> Ben.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 584 36 LINKÖPING |
| +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
