> You are being deliberately provocative. Of course one can build a > serious application without java.security. One can even build a > secure application without it, though java.security gives you better > control. A compiler, a word-processor, an editor, or any single-user > application should not to deal with security concerns. I almost miss your last sentance. It seems you are agreeing with me rather. The serious applications I mean is something more on the line of accessing corporate database, distribute processing and at least embedded Java beans for scalable programs development. A word-processor, an editor...of java....man you beat me! XD Alan. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Quitting debian-java Vincent Renardias
- Re: Quitting debian-java Mark W. Eichin
- Re: Quitting debian-java Alexander Hvostov
- Re: Quitting debian-java Alexander Hvostov
- Re: Quitting debian-java Alan KF LAU
- Re: Quitting debian-java Ben Burton
- Re: Quitting debian-java Alexander Hvostov
- Re: Quitting debian-java Alan KF LAU
- Re: Quitting debian-java Per Bothner
- Re: Quitting debian-java Bob Ham
- Re: Quitting debian-java Alan KF LAU
- Re: Quitting debian-java Alexander Hvostov
- Re: Quitting debian-java Alan KF LAU
- Re: Quitting debian-java Alexander Hvostov
- Re: Quitting debian-java Alan KF LAU
- Re: Quitting debian-java Eric Molitor
- Re: Quitting debian-java Alan KF LAU
- Re: Quitting debian-java Alan KF LAU
- Re: Quitting debian-java Benjamin Black
- Re: Quitting debian-java Alexander Hvostov
- Re: Quitting debian-java Seth Arnold