Am 2004-02-02 13:24:24, schrieb Fred Whipple: >Hi Everyone, >I see that Debian 3.0r2 includes a nicely aged (like fine cheese) Linux >2.2 kernel. While I'm certain the aging process only makes its flavour
Who install 2.2.22 ??? There is a 2.4.18-bf24 too. >stronger and more delectable, I'm afraid it's going to choke at the >thought of 10,000 threads. Say nothing of 20,000. Now I imagine it's >not so difficult to simply compile a recent 2.4 (2.5?) kernel and go Install the bf24 and then get the Source 2.4.24 and compile your own one. >from there. Is this fair? Or would you suppose that the current stable >Debian is too old in other areas to properly handle kernel 2.4? 2.6.1 runs too ! >Finally, while I'm messing around with the kernel, I'd have to include >support for ext3fs. In our environment, journaling is not an option, No problem, I use ext3 since 2.4.18 >it's a base requirement. Of course replacing the kernel would pretty >much give me kernel-level support for it. From that point, how >complicated is it to get the rest of the tools to play nicely with >ext3fs? I'd imagine that a large set of tools would need to be >replaced, including e2fsck, mount, umount, etc. All tools are suporting ext3 >Thanks once again for all the info so far! > > -Fred Whipple Greetings Michelle -- Registered Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
