On Fri, 25 Apr 2003 01:48 am, you wrote: > Proxy ARP on the .146/.147 box for .158?
I would have thought so too but all my attempts at arp'ing just get errors like... (including a lot of attempted variations).. # arp -i eth1 -s x.x.x.158 00:20:ED:47:B3:21 netmask 255.255.255.240 SIOCSARP: Invalid argument No combination of static routes has worked so far either. I usually work with full c-classes and switches so am on unfamiliar territory. Should I look at bridging the interfaces ? ... perhaps snat ? > x.x.x.145 <-> eth0:x.x.x.146 eth1:x.x.x.147 <-xover-> eth0:x.x.x.158 --markc
