-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 19 November 2002 15:34, Russell Coker wrote:
> So this leaves DNS caching as the only reason for BIND. Is there a DNS > server that does caching better than BIND? djbdns/tinydns IS faster, but problem i had with it are the distribution policy and there is no support for CIDR. I want to restrict recursion to networks smaller/bigger then /24. /16 etc. there is also pdnsd - http://home.t-online.de/home/Moestl/ and dnrd http://dnrd.nevalabs.org/ but there are meant for personal use. I don't know if they would handle the load. - -- "We should not be trying to use technical solutions to solve a social problem." [Thomas R. Stephenson ("about SPAM" - Pegasus list 16.12.1999)] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE92lmnEyTmlrVpUvwRAh+OAJ0Tmp1dRC7C4fS4msITkPrlsDF2aQCfbTcm RtDAngCCI6eI+SyX+tig0XI= =wxgA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
