On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 12:46:14PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > the main thing i'm worried about is that bind9 had enormous memory leaks when > i tried 9.0 several months ago. i hope they're fixed now.
FYI, doesn't look like the memory leaks have been fixed: # ps v -Cnamed PID TTY STAT TIME MAJFL TRS DRS RSS %MEM COMMAND 6799 ? S 0:00 111 232 336175 200968 39.1 /usr/sbin/named -u bind 6801 ? S 0:00 0 232 336175 200968 39.1 /usr/sbin/named -u bind 6802 ? S 466:10 2757 232 336175 200968 39.1 /usr/sbin/named -u bind 6803 ? S 0:04 1 232 336175 200968 39.1 /usr/sbin/named -u bind 6804 ? R 49:56 1 232 336175 200968 39.1 /usr/sbin/named -u bind this is on a machine where bind 8 used to use about 150MB. bind 9 has been running for only 4 days. i'm going to revert back to bind 8 now that the patched 8.3.3-3 has been uploaded to unstable. craig -- craig sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fabricati Diem, PVNC. -- motto of the Ankh-Morpork City Watch
