On Thursday 08 March 2001 04:29, Neale Banks wrote: > Inded, as well as (unsuccessfully) attempting to build current BIND for > slink (separate story), I'm motivated to try to build the latest postfix > (postfix_0.0.20010228-2, which includes LDAP support) for *potato*. > > I'm prepared to concede defeat and upgrade the slink system to potato > (there are other motivating factors here too - things too old just become > too hard sooner or later - OTOH >400 days uptime can be strong motivation > to just "let it be"). > > Getting back to the main event, postfix has moved ahead since the version > that's in potato and the LDAP support is "interesting". I tried building > postfix_0.0.20010228-2 on potato last night and it bombed out like this: > > I'm guessing that this is because I've got potato's standard libopenldap* > (1.2.11-1) but the later postfix depends on libldap2 (>= 2.0.2-2). > > Then starts the slippery slope... the libldap2 in unstable depends on > libsasl7, which in its turn recommends libsasl-modules (the only > consolation here is that libsasl7 etc is also in testing). > > Any suggestions other than building all of those for potato (and no, I > don't want to upgrade yet).
I have .deb's of the latest LDAP stuff for Potato. I didn't build them though. Hopefully we can establish some sort of official repository for such things and manage them properly... -- http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
