Typing away merrily, elyograg produced the immortal words: > I was thinking about this recently, and here's what I reasoned (but have > never put to the test). Due to the way that reverse DNS works, what would > have to happen is whatever body gave you the address space would have to > actually create an entry in their server for each address - yes, 62 > entries, that delegates DNS for those addresses to your DNS server. Either > that or they just have to provide the reverse DNS for you. > > As for how to handle secondary DNS, I'm still scratching my head trying to > work that one out.
BCP 20. Which is currently RFC 2317. Titled "Classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation". Follow that, and most things should work, with the caveats stated therein about older BIND servers. -- HTML email - just say no --> Phil Pennock "We've got a patent on the conquering of a country through the use of force. We believe in world peace through extortionate license fees." -Bluemeat
