Sure it's feasible, I've done it. Actually these are all good reasons *to* do it this way. U retain more control over who can see what. Call me paranoid. Not knocking smbwebclient, this is just more locked-down.
At 09:50 AM 12/27/04 +0100, Leonardo Boselli wrote: >This is not feasible for three good reasons: > 1. i would need to authenticate the access page > so giving an username/password to anuy possible user, each one with > its permissions. > 2. I do not know in advance not only the users, but neither what are the > possible shares to be used. > 3. Even if I knew all the data i would need to know the user password > for access to any share ... > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
