On Monday 06 December 2004 19:34, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Various AOL mailservers, the Debian mailservers, and other servers sending > out lots of regular mail get listed in spamcop regularly, so my > recommendation (and that of spamcop.net themselves, btw) is not to use > bl.spamcop.net for blacklisting. Use it in spamassassin to score points.
Received: from johnny.adanco.com (151.adsl.as8758.net [212.25.16.151]) by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B42442DED6 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 02:34:01 -0600 (CST) Received: from humphrey.adanco.local (humphrey.adanco.local [172.18.10.16]) by johnny.adanco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E4B2C6D for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 09:34:01 +0100 (CET) The Debian servers correctly preserve the Received: path. This is used by Spamcop to assign blame to the correct server. Above are the original Received: headers from your message to the list, if your message was reported to Spamcop then it would send a complaint to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about IP address 212.25.16.151. If your message was reported to spamcop it would not list a Debian server, it would list 212.25.16.151. I doubt that Debian servers get listed regularly. I use the spamcop DNSBL and it doesn't get in the way of Debian mailing lists. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
