On Monday 18 October 2004 16:15, Ian Forbes wrote: > What mount options give the best performance, "noatime" "data=journal" ?
The fellow that runs KDE's news site recently did some investigation of speed / disk usage for Zope's object database vs. ext3. He figured the hierarchical nature of the article and comment history could be represented by a file system pretty easily, so was curious how ext3 would fare compared to ZODB. There were some useful comments about optimizing ext3 posted in response to his original post. Some things that were mentioned: - use htree - use 2.6 orlov (?) - mount with data=writeback - mount with commit=9999 The blog post and comments are here: http://navindra.blogspot.com/2004/10/kde-dot-news-ext3s-miserable-failure.html His blog entry seems to support the contention that if you want expert feedback about a tool, just say it sucks. ;) Regards, Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
