Am So, den 18.04.2004 schrieb Andrew Miehs um 01:16: > I suggest you all read > > http://www.porcupine.org/postfix-mirror/newdoc/NFS_README.html > > Especially the sentence > 'Thus, Postfix on NFS is slightly less reliable than Postfix on a local > disk.' > > Either something is reliable or not. there is no such thing as slightly > less reliable.
I suggest you read it first... Quote from NFS_README.html: --------------------------- # In order to have mailbox locking over NFS you have to configure # everything to use fcntl() locks for mailbox access (or switch to # maildir style, which needs no application-level lock controls). So if you use maildir (which you probably will with a setup like this) you won't have any problems with NFS at all. And yes, we run setups like this - with some hundred thousand mails per day - and never had a problem... best regards, Markus -- Markus Oswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> \ Unix and Network Administration Graz, AUSTRIA \ High Availability / Cluster Mobile: +43 676 6485415 \ System Consulting Fax: +43 316 428896 \ Web Development -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
