martin f krafft wrote: > > also sprach Dale E Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [2003.09.04.1447 +0200]: > > Has it been covered before on this list? I for one would be > > interested in elaboration, if there is something technically > > inferior about exim or postfix to qmail or sendmail? Or > > politically, I suppose, since much of people's dislike about qmail > > has more to due with "political" than technical reasons. > > random notes (these are facts and opinions, please don't flame me): > > - sendmail and exim are both single setuid binaries. bad. > - postfix is the most performant of all four. > - qmail has an interesting but possibly confusing > configuration paradigm > - postfix has the easiest configuration, IMHO. > - qmail has a good integration with one of the fastest mailing list > servers, ezmlm. > - exim is very extensible. > - qmail does not come with anything but basic mail transfer stuff. if > you want things like tls or sasl, you have to patch. > - qmail isn't available as a binary package for Debian. > - qmail support includes being flamed by the author > - postfix and exim support are available here, and if only be me and > dman respectively (note that you have to mention my name in a post > if you want me to see it. i am writing my phd and am thus > filtering messages to not be flooded) > - ralf hildebrandt uses postfix (he's the guru, next to wietse. > > can't think of any more. > Complete ACK. I'm also willing to give support, as I use postfix+mysql+sasl at a couple of clients.
Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
