What about different views, e.g. for internal vs external networks. vec
----- Original Message ----- From: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Debian ISP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 7:34 AM Subject: DNS servers > I've just started playing with nsd, it appears very promising. > > It offers authoritative serving only (only primary and secondary no caching or > proxying). It uses a database for all primary zones (fast startup). It > seems to have been designed for security and reliability. > > It has basic compatability with BIND zone files, although I suspect that it > may not handle bad zone files as well (so you just have to get them right ;). > > I'm thinking of putting it on some of my servers in the near future. > > So this leaves DNS caching as the only reason for BIND. Is there a DNS server > that does caching better than BIND? > > -- > http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages > http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark > http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark > http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
