> > I have a very straight setup but upgrading to bind 9 was done in under > > 4 seconds. (approx 50 domains). no troubles so far. > > yep, bind 9.2.x seems a lot better than 9.0 or 9.1. > > it seems to use more memory than bind8. > > > > i'm doing a trial upgrade (on another server by copying over zone files) > right now. > > a few little gotchas (e.g. ownership/perms of zonefiles) , but easily > fixed. > > i'll probably be ready to upgrade my main dns server in an hour or so. > > the main thing i'm worried about is that bind9 had enormous memory leaks > when i tried 9.0 several months ago. i hope they're fixed now. >
We're still on named 8.3.3-REL-NOESW (currently in stable). Is it much of a headache to upgrade to 9.2.x? Any particular procedure or guide you followed that could be read somewhere? TIA. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
